Zoostorm 7200-5284B

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 50% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Zoostorm 7200-5284B (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK H170-PRO
Memory	11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180516
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '18 at 02:28
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 110 2-Core 216 73% 132 Pts	4-Core 343 8-Core 588 56% 466 Pts	64-Core 582 36% 582 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Nvidia(10DE 119D) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.7% Excellent	Lighting 109 Reflection 108 Parallax 104 88% 107 fps	MRender 96 Gravity 92.3 Splatting 95 77% 94.4 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SNAT128G1122 128GB 1,041 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z2333000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 164 165 165 165 163 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	59.5% Above average	Read 418 Write 171 Mixed 148 SusWrite 164 50% 225 MB/s	4K Read 20.8 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 12 88% 36.8 MB/s	DQ Read 168 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 74.6 82% 138 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 59.5% Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 186GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 112 109 110 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	77.7% Very good	Read 160 Write 140 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 111 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 77.7% Great: 109%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 570GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 111 110 111 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.9% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 87.3 Mixed 60.7 SusWrite 110 65% 88.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GB 3,829 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 11.7 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 9.3 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 7200-5284B Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 52%

Yacht

System: Zoostorm 7200-5284B

CPU
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	14x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SNAT128G1122 128GBSandiskBench 61%, 1,041 samples	6x
Green SATA M.2 120GBWD $47Bench 53%, 6,576 samples	1x
P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBCrucial $73Bench 212%, 171,271 samples	1x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	3x
CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBD1 2x8GBCrucialBench 72%, 3,829 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $312

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16