Biostar X370GT5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.1%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics37.9% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardBiostar X370GT5  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 01:29
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$95
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.1% Poor
SC Int 37.3
SC Float 41.3
SC Mixed 39.4
32% 39.3 Pts
QC Int 117
QC Float 134
QC Mixed 127
28% 126 Pts
MC Int 141
MC Float 153
MC Mixed 157
22% 151 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Zotac(19DA A454) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
37.9% Below average
Lighting 112
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 129
36% 106 fps
MRender 79.4
Gravity 111
Splatting 80.5
39% 90.3 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.9%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$120
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 88 69 72 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 461
Write 450
Mixed 311
SusWrite 117
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 51.6
4K Mixed 36.9
119% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 235
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 230
171% 226 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$19
244GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 85 85 86 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54% Above average
Read 103
Write 88.8
Mixed 60
SusWrite 84.9
62% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 54%
Great: 59%
Maxtor 6V300F0 300GB
29GB free
Firmware: VA111900
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 44 44 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 35
Write 45.8
Mixed 31
SusWrite 43.9
29% 38.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0
138% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2400C14 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.2
35% 12.4 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X370GT5 Builds (Compare 191 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Biostar X370GT5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $360Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $120
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $147SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $60Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $145SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback