Fujitsu FMVNE5AE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu FMVNE5AE  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB224
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120619
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 11 '18 at 01:27
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 90.1
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 168
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 223
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15E9) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.22% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.73
Parallax 1.62
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 3.38
Gravity 1.33
Splatting 4.61
3% 3.11 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.22%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM11.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 88 91 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 426
Write 345
Mixed 324
SusWrite 111
67% 302 MB/s
4K Read 16.6
4K Write 34.2
4K Mixed 20.5
70% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 305
DQ Mixed 206
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.7
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback