Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte A320MA-M.2
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180417
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '18 at 00:53
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR) 12,273 User benchmarks, average bench 40% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	43.9% Average	Memory 61.4 1-Core 58.4 2-Core 110 46% 76.4 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 165 21% 159 Pts	64-Core 181 11% 181 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.9% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 37,078 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	5.46% Terrible	Lighting 7.03 Reflection 9.46 Parallax 10.8 6% 9.09 fps	MRender 3.86 Gravity 8.37 Splatting 5.74 5% 5.99 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.46% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 400GB (2007)-$42 1,778 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01C01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 36.7 Write 28.3 Mixed 12 19% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.5 77% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 43%
WD WD1600BEVS-22UST0 160GB 6,043 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 149GB free Firmware: 12.01A12 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,062 Write 25.5 Mixed 15 263% 367 MB/s	4K Read 119 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 3 5,326% 41.2 MB/s
Poor: 9% Great: 34%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 929GB free Firmware: JA0OA560 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 86 90 87 88 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	50.8% Above average	Read 88.9 Write 42.5 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 87.9 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 57%
ST310005 24AS 1TB 82 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 417GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 871 Write 12.7 Mixed 23.6 211% 303 MB/s	4K Read 152 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1.4 635% 51.4 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2400 C15 2x4GB 38,955 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.6% Poor	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 8.2 24% 8.23 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.53 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-A320MA-M.2-CF Builds (Compare 145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 42%

Speed boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 39%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320MA-M.2-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	14x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	12x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	13x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	12x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	11x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	6x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	8x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $311

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16