Lenovo 4180WG5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4180WG5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4180WG5
Memory10.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 21:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 132
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 199
8-Core 191
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.02% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 3.31
Parallax 1.53
2% 2.38 fps
MRender 2.76
Gravity 1.2
Splatting 4
2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.02%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
19GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 453
Write 419
Mixed 343
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 76.8
4K Mixed 37.2
125% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 298
232% 318 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8
6GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 11 8.4 8.6 8.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 17
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 11.8
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.9
180% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.2% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 10.7
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 10.3
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback