Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121130
Uptime13 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 21:30
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 42%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 391
52% 392 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 30.3
Parallax 37.5
37% 37.7 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39
Splatting 35.6
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 113 107 99 109 112 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
78.9% Very good
Read 475
Write 399
Mixed 276
SusWrite 134
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 26.3
124% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 158
166% 276 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 138 137 136 137 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 96.8
Write 94.8
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 136
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1.1
205% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 108%
Maxtor OneTouch 500GB
128GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 3.7
Mixed 9.5
SusWrite 25.8
20% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.9
61% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-432.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.4% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 9
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.5
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 8.97 GB/s
Latency 68.6
58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $554
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback