MSI K9A2GM V2(MS-7302)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MICRO-STAR MS-7302
Motherboard	MSI K9A2GM V2(MS-7302) (all builds)
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090324
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration	158 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 6000+ 5,594 User benchmarks, average bench 41% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.2% Average	Memory 76 1-Core 43 2-Core 79.9 44% 66.3 Pts	4-Core 87.7 8-Core 87.5 12% 87.6 Pts	64-Core 88.9 6% 88.9 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.2% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon X300/X550/X1050 Series Sapphire(174B 1490) 256MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.56.1.16 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.27 Reflection 1 0% 0.63 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Maxtor STM3160215AS 160GB 8,567 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 105GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.AAD SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 48 44 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 12.5 Write 17.8 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 28 14% 18.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 47% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 41%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 83GB free Firmware: JP2OA3MA SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 49 46 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	30.7% Below average	Read 77.6 Write 97.1 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 29.1 44% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.7% Great: 74%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 54GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 57 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Read 83.8 Write 32.3 Mixed 51 SusWrite 36.5 38% 50.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 77%
Samsung SP2504C 250GB-$29 14,402 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 150GB free Firmware: VT100-50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 56 12 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	23% Poor	Read 43.4 Write 54.1 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 36.4 28% 38.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 124% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	23% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 6 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 6 19% 6.6 GB/s	Latency 88.4 45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K9A2GM V2(MS-7302) Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

Motherboard: MSI K9A2GM V2(MS-7302)

CPU
Athlon II X2 245AMDBench 41%, 6,247 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 4600 Series (Engineering Sample - WDDM v1.1)ATIBench 5%, 155 samples	1x

RAM
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MSI K9A2GM V2(MS-7302)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: MSI K9A2GM V2(MS-7302)

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)