Asus K72F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
SystemAsus K72F  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K72F
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100716
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 19:06
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium P6100
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
22.7% Poor
SC Int 46.1
SC Float 50.9
SC Mixed 48.6
39% 48.5 Pts
QC Int 89.2
QC Float 94.6
QC Mixed 89.7
21% 91.2 Pts
MC Int 91.8
MC Float 96.2
MC Mixed 94.9
14% 94.3 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
Asus(1043 1702) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
0.8% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.4
Parallax 2.1
1% 2.17 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1.5
Splatting 3.4
1% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.8%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WD3200BEVT-22ZCT0 512GB
55GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 226 225 227 231 231 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 233
Write 155
Mixed 207
SusWrite 227
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 22.2
77% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 94.2
DQ Mixed 97.8
84% 126 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Adata AD73I1B1672EG 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
23.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 9.6
23% 8.07 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 38%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical K72F Builds (Compare 70 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K72F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback