Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 16:07
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$90
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
45.5% Average
1-Core 71.1
2-Core 143
50% 107 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 328
37% 285 Pts
64-Core 324
22% 324 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
7.24% Terrible
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 20
Parallax 28.9
7% 24.7 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 31
Splatting 24.6
8% 24.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.24%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 247 260 273 276 275 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 421
Write 402
Mixed 290
SusWrite 271
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 42.3
141% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 51.7
44% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 88 85 87 87 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 83.4
Write 83
Mixed 58.6
SusWrite 86.5
57% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
264GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 112 112 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79.6% Very good
Read 163
Write 167
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 114
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 58 58 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.8% Below average
Read 77.4
Write 50.9
Mixed 41.4
SusWrite 57.4
42% 56.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.5% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 10.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 5,017 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 35% - Below average Total price: $706
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $195AMD RX 590 $185Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $340Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $259Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $51
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback