Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.48% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD FX-6300-$65
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.4% Below average
SC Int 47.9
SC Float 49.7
SC Mixed 46.9
38% 48.2 Pts
QC Int 161
QC Float 155
QC Mixed 155
36% 157 Pts
MC Int 259
MC Float 240
MC Mixed 251
38% 250 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
9.48% Terrible
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 28
8% 24.3 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 24.3
10% 24.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.48%
Great: 11%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$130
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 183 230 232 232 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 251
Write 245
Mixed 209
SusWrite 219
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 26.5
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 51
43% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 82 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 77.9
Write 72.2
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 80.9
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
264GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 125
Write 98.4
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 74.9
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 47 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 44.4
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 45.6
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $692
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $724SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback