Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics7.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 15:16
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
AMD FX-6300-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
29.6% Poor
1-Core 46.9
2-Core 98.4
34% 72.7 Pts
4-Core 155
8-Core 184
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 251
17% 251 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
7.19% Terrible
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 28
7% 24.3 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 30.8
Splatting 24.3
8% 24.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.19%
Great: 8%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 183 230 232 232 225 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.5% Above average
Read 251
Write 245
Mixed 209
SusWrite 219
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 37.8
4K Mixed 26.5
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 39.8
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 51
43% 60.8 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 117%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB
738GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 82 84 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 77.9
Write 72.2
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 80.9
52% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 51%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
264GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 74 74 75 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 125
Write 98.4
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 74.9
68% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$75
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 46 47 46 46 45 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 44.4
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 45.6
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 116%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown RMB2GE484CA5-13HC Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX RMB2GE484CA5-13HC 8GB
667, 800, 667 MHz
2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
30.2% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 10.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 7.2
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 88.1
45% 88.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 34%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $696
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $234Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $260Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $65SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $75Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback