PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 48.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120705 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 14:20 |
Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 8% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 1380) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.9%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 103 108 107 106 MB/s
|
48.8%
Average
|
|||
OCZ-VERTEX 32GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 105 103 103 103 104 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$13
455GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 98 103 108 107 106 MB/s
|
56.7%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
30.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 40x |
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 31x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $268 |