User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.8%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics16.2% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardBangho W240HU/W250HUQ
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110216
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 11:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-2310M-$170
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.8% Poor
SC Int 54.5
SC Float 55.3
SC Mixed 54.2
44% 54.7 Pts
QC Int 133
QC Float 134
QC Mixed 133
30% 133 Pts
MC Int 133
MC Float 140
MC Mixed 139
21% 137 Pts
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 31%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460-$203
MSI(1462 2321) 768MB
CLim: 727 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 768MB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 45.1
Parallax 44.9
14% 45.2 fps
MRender 42.6
Gravity 46.3
Splatting 35.3
18% 41.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 19%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK2546GSX 250GB-$30
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LB014C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 46 40 43 42 45 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
27.6% Poor
Read 53.1
Write 50.1
Mixed 32
SusWrite 42.9
33% 44.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown N3S04F1333EREV.00 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $350Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $100
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $155Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $249Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $110
Intel Core i7-7700K $355AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $140SanDisk Extreme 64GB $42
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $30
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $55Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $160SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback