Asus X99-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus X99-M WS  (all builds)
Memory61.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 09:43
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5930K-$70
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 30
1-Core 5.5
2-Core 10.2
12% 15.2 Pts
4-Core 20.3
8-Core 27.4
3% 23.8 Pts
64-Core 30.8
2% 30.8 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 13.2
Parallax 42.7
9% 22.4 fps
MRender 71
Gravity 79.9
Splatting 94.6
68% 81.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 497 556 530 540 585 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 831
Write 857
Mixed 698
SusWrite 535
164% 730 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 17.3
4K Mixed 15.1
53% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 59.4
DQ Write 53
DQ Mixed 54.6
41% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 393%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
2TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 190 196 195 193 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 154
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 192
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
15GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.2 5 5 5 5.3 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 37
Write 6.2
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 5.3
14% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.3
102% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2800 C14 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
26.9% Poor
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 13.6
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 0.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 0.8
3% 1.07 GB/s
Latency 255
16% 255 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 147%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-M WS Builds (Compare 148 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $472
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback