PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20130410 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Aug 10 '18 at 07:49 |
Run Duration | 149 Seconds |
Run User | ISL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
67.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.1
|
22.2%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 277 279 265 256 246 MB/s
|
82.1%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
92GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 259 258 258 259 259 MB/s
|
83%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate ST1500LM003-9YH148 1.5TB
133GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 48 49 51 50 MB/s
|
35.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
46.9%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 379x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 102x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 82x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 44x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 43x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 29x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $729 |