Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '18 at 07:49
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ISL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 85.7
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 148
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 268
8-Core 444
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 456
28% 456 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Lighting 26.9
Reflection 29
Parallax 32.1
22% 29.3 fps
MRender 25.3
Gravity 21.6
Splatting 34.2
23% 27 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 277 279 265 256 246 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 436
Write 398
Mixed 395
SusWrite 283
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 25.7
4K Write 63
4K Mixed 38.5
122% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 161
133% 191 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 129%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
92GB free
Firmware: EXT0AB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 259 258 258 259 259 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 456
Write 281
Mixed 317
SusWrite 271
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 38
124% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 174
141% 200 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83%
Great: 118%
Seagate ST1500LM003-9YH148 1.5TB
133GB free
Firmware: CC9F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 48 49 51 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 75.4
Write 76.1
Mixed 45.4
SusWrite 49.6
45% 61.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.9% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 16.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 71.5
56% 71.5 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback