Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 44% Speed boat	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	57.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Gigabyte AB350-Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171201
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 10 '18 at 03:28
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87 71,313 User benchmarks, average bench 61% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 99.4 2-Core 195 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 529 55% 442 Pts	64-Core 534 33% 534 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6262) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	57.3% Above average	Lighting 70.7 Reflection 65.3 Parallax 57.8 58% 64.6 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 67.7 Splatting 70.2 57% 69.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 3GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT07B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 26 27 25 25 25 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 298 Write 33 Mixed 63.8 SusWrite 26.4 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 33.8 4K Mixed 12.4 75% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 255 DQ Write 41.3 DQ Mixed 39.7 57% 112 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 413GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 115 124 122 122 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 94.5 Write 116 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 121 64% 89.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GB-$67 46,617 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	79.3% Very good	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 29.1 MC Mixed 27.5 83% 29.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 26.4 SC Mixed 23.1 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 81%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AB350-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 1,126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 45%

Yacht

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 42%

Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming-CF

CPU
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	247x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples	118x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	92x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	115x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	78x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	30x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	57x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	47x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	23x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16