Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive1.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 15:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 74.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 884
82% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,135
70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 1C03) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
17.7% Very poor
Lighting 10.1
Reflection 23.3
Parallax 13.7
8% 15.7 fps
MRender 31.4
Gravity 49.5
Splatting 48.4
36% 43.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
361GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM13.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.1 1.9 5.9 8.3 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.6% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 17.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 4.5
4% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
2% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 102%
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
204GB free
Firmware: Z3106000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.3 2.3 2.1 6.9 8.6 7.9 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
1.91% Terrible
Read 23.6
Write 22.1
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 4.8
4% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 1.91%
Great: 66%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.2 1.8 6.2 8.1 7.3 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
7.25% Terrible
Read 20.6
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.3
SusWrite 4.5
11% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 7.25%
Great: 84%
Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000.C 1TB-$40
558GB free
Firmware: JP4OA3MA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.3 2 6.5 8.4 7.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.51% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 18.9
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 4.6
13% 16.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 7.51%
Great: 74%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
364GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.4 2.3 1.7 6.5 8.2 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
7.8% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 18.1
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 4.5
12% 16.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 7.8%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL17-17-17 D4-2400 CL16-16-16 D4-2400 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.5% Very good
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 24.3
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 27.6
SC Mixed 22.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback