Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.87% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	56.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 86.1 1-Core 75.1 2-Core 146 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 225 8-Core 318 34% 271 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Sanyo(144D C0A5) 2GB Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.87% Terrible	Lighting 2.03 Reflection 4.69 Parallax 1.38 2% 2.7 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.13 Splatting 3.78 2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.87% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 480GB-$160 11,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 400GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01.4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 121 74 73 73 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 435 Write 394 Mixed 360 SusWrite 135 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 29.8 4K Mixed 22.2 72% 23.4 MB/s	DQ Read 296 DQ Write 73.8 DQ Mixed 102 97% 157 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6EFR8A-PB HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 12GB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 14.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.7 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 14.3 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 71.2 56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	163x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	70x
GeForce GT 540MNvidiaBench 3%, 15,328 samples	68x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	28x
SH564128FH8NZPHSCR 2x4GBSmartBench 42%, 520 samples	18x
M471B5773CHS-CH9 M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 37%, 1,304 samples	15x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $227

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16