Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime28.3 Days
Run DateAug 09 '18 at 00:48
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 85.9
2-Core 154
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 400
43% 342 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.7.1
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.6% Below average
Lighting 41.3
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 51.9
34% 40.2 fps
MRender 26.7
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 34.3
28% 33.7 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM256E 251GB
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM09A1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 209 192 199 127 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 316
Write 205
Mixed 204
SusWrite 165
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 39.7
4K Mixed 19.8
75% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 91.3
69% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 97%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 104 105 103 103 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 97.5
Write 94.3
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 104
70% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 67%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
2TB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 0 0 25 130 131 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 154
Write 162
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 63.9
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback