Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	12.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M3N-HT DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '18 at 05:53
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49% Average	Memory 78.3 1-Core 37.1 2-Core 44.2 40% 53.2 Pts	4-Core 116 8-Core 130 16% 123 Pts	64-Core 134 8% 134 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 8366) 1GB CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 347.52 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 6% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 49 89 92 78 110 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	12.8% Very poor	Read 115 Write 127 Mixed 109 SusWrite 74.1 24% 106 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 4 12% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 233GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 41 49 48 50 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.2% Below average	Read 145 Write 94.9 Mixed 126 SusWrite 43.5 23% 102 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 40.3 4K Mixed 22.8 84% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 39.2 DQ Write 92.7 DQ Mixed 53.7 44% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 175GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 40 41 49 48 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	17.1% Very poor	Read 16 Write 60.1 Mixed 13.6 SusWrite 43.3 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	27.2% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 10.4 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 5 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 6.6 17% 5.83 GB/s	Latency 83.8 48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.2% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N-HT DELUXE Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M3N-HT DELUXE

CPU
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	5x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 470NvidiaBench 16%, 5,537 samples	3x
GTX 460Nvidia $203Bench 12%, 31,648 samples	1x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	1x

SSD
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	1x
Vertex 4 256GBOCZ $400Bench 91%, 12,355 samples	1x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16