Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 81% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 63% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	86.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	10.2 Days
Run Date	Aug 06 '18 at 02:04
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 96.9 1-Core 121 2-Core 242 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 472 8-Core 479 63% 475 Pts	64-Core 468 29% 468 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3302) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	86.8% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 113 Parallax 95.8 90% 107 fps	MRender 96.1 Gravity 97.9 Splatting 99.1 80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 133 152 147 146 142 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 488 Mixed 364 SusWrite 166 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 45.7 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 58.9 208% 74.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 233 210% 319 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 118%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB 13,178 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 894GB free Firmware: JP4OA41A SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 137 135 137 136 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Read 133 Write 126 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 136 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsZ DDR3 2133 C11 2x8GB 632 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	MC Read 29.2 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 24.2 80% 28 GB/s	SC Read 19.7 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 25.6 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 50.6 79% 50.6 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	236x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	33x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	28x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16