Lenovo 20EV000XPB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.79% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EV000XPB  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EV000XPB
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180605
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 22:23
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 96
2-Core 171
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 258
34% 255 Pts
64-Core 260
16% 260 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 5049) 1GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.79% Terrible
Lighting 7.17
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 7.03
6% 8.12 fps
MRender 9.43
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 14.3
9% 10 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.79%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF192HCGS-000L1 192GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXT03L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 71 69 67 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 399
Write 62.8
Mixed 119
SusWrite 70.9
35% 163 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 22.5
4K Mixed 16.2
61% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 27.6
DQ Mixed 27.3
30% 51.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1315 CT102464BF160B.C16 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 21.9
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 20.3
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback