MCJ H61MU-S01 (MS-7680)

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	MCJ H61MU-S01 (MS-7680) (all builds)
Motherboard	MCJ H61MU-S01 (MS-7680)
Memory	0.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110505
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 05 '18 at 15:10
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$197 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	65.6% Good	Memory 89.9 1-Core 85.5 2-Core 166 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 307 34% 268 Pts	64-Core 362 22% 362 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3202) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.3% Poor	Lighting 41.1 Reflection 38.4 Parallax 36.5 34% 38.7 fps	MRender 8.38 Gravity 17.9 Splatting 17.3 12% 14.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 128GB free Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 116 59 49 50 50 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.2% Above average	Read 237 Write 231 Mixed 220 SusWrite 77.1 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 44.9 4K Mixed 28.8 93% 31.7 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 176 DQ Mixed 176 133% 177 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 592GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC3C SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 35 49 40 41 33 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 94.3 Write 99.8 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 37.9 44% 60.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 81% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team-Elite-1333 Team-Elite-1333 8GB 194 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	47.6% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 15.1 47% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 13 SC Write 13.4 SC Mixed 13.3 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 67.3 59% 67.3 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

MCJ H61MU-S01 (MS-7680)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)