Asrock 970 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics49.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock 970 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateAug 05 '18 at 11:32
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 57.6
2-Core 107
52% 81.3 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 214
24% 189 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1055 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.1
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.8% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 62.2
Parallax 85.2
47% 68.3 fps
MRender 61.2
Gravity 60.4
Splatting 78
56% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 57%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
331GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 181 175 174 176 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 375
Write 280
Mixed 181
SusWrite 175
56% 253 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 22.4
81% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 25.8
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 30.1
28% 40.7 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
112GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 187 149 149 149 150 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 256
Write 352
Mixed 279
SusWrite 166
60% 263 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 34.4
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 42.2
34% 46 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 115%
General USB Flash Disk 32GB
30GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.4 9.4 16 15 14 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 29.1
Write 18.9
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 12.1
24% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.4
80% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-442.A00LF 9905403-173.A00LF 99U5403-003.A00LF 8GB
667, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 15.3
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.1
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $396
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback