PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | Dell Precision Tower 5810 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds) |
Memory | 51.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20180419 |
Uptime | 1.9 Days |
Run Date | Aug 03 '18 at 23:44 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | KOR-User |
Background CPU | 100% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v3
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
|
66%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.69
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
4.04%
Terrible
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 1TB
506GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 27 27 17 19 26 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
84.8%
Excellent
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples | 1,240x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 956x |
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples | 408x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 414x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 386x |
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples | 287x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 27% - Poor | Total price: $80 |