MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A39
MotherboardMSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39)  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180710
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateAug 03 '18 at 06:06
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$79
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 71
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 176
65% 112 Pts
4-Core 305
8-Core 311
42% 308 Pts
64-Core 313
21% 313 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 77%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Seagate ST9320320AS 320GB-$170
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 26 29 25 21 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
9.29% Terrible
Read 7.3
Write 20.3
Mixed 13.3
SusWrite 24.8
12% 16.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.29%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
43.2% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.7
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 99.2
40% 99.2 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 47%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) Builds (Compare 19,202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI B350M GAMING PRO (MS-7A39) - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $619
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback