User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.3%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics9.01% is a very low 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC). CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemRazer Blade
MotherboardRazer C1_MB
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180522
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 02 '18 at 12:24
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
SC Int 119
SC Float 88
SC Mixed 126
89% 111 Pts
QC Int 400
QC Float 421
QC Mixed 413
93% 411 Pts
MC Int 707
MC Float 838
MC Mixed 742
114% 762 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.01% Terrible
Lighting 22.5
Reflection 252
Parallax 24.3
7% 99.4 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 20.4
Splatting 34.6
10% 25.9 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.01%
Great: 9%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
419GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7501Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 760 529 573 625 630 630 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 1,108
Write 1,229
Mixed 693
SusWrite 625
205% 914 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 96.3
4K Mixed 60.2
201% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 927
DQ Write 796
DQ Mixed 847
639% 857 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 183%
Great: 257%
Kingston DataTraveler HyperX USB 3.0 64GB-$104
59GB free, PID 162b
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 168 140 184 182 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 219
Write 69.9
Mixed 106
SusWrite 155
169% 138 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.5
132% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
78.8% Very good
MC Read 32.3
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 25
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 83%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $243Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $770Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback