Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	5.5 Days
Run Date	Aug 01 '18 at 09:33
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Memory 79.5 1-Core 122 2-Core 245 82% 149 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 913 84% 701 Pts	64-Core 1,282 79% 1,282 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 81%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,827 Write 2,981 Mixed 699 411% 1,836 MB/s	4K Read 380 4K Write 240 4K Mixed 212 975% 278 MB/s	DQ Read 1,138 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 838 662% 926 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 15GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 496 Write 474 Mixed 354 98% 441 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 56.2 193% 67.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 356 DQ Mixed 358 271% 364 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$32 107,978 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 106GB free Firmware: JC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 95 97 95 97 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 76 Write 73.5 Mixed 48 SusWrite 95.5 54% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1 176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 70%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 511GB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 114 112 114 114 115 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 102 Write 89 Mixed 69.7 SusWrite 112 69% 93.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 114%
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100 19,960 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 472GB free Firmware: CC34 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 80 79 78 79 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Read 76.2 Write 58 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 78.3 47% 63.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 61%
Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB 12,762 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 1TB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 119 119 119 119 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 101 Write 78.2 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 118 66% 90.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 0.7 230% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 104%
Patriot Supersonic Xpress USB 3.0 64GB-$15 170 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 27GB free, PID 5000 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 147 141 133 135 137 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 181 Write 94.2 Mixed 35 SusWrite 140 138% 113 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 2.2 142% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 75%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 25GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 63 63 63 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	27.9% Poor	Read 58.8 Write 58.5 Mixed 28.2 SusWrite 62.8 70% 52.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 53%
HGST 1TB 1,195 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 802GB free, PID 1014 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 102 101 103 102 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	42.1% Average	Read 102 Write 84.5 Mixed 37.2 SusWrite 102 107% 81.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB 4,772 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	MC Read 33.8 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 29.8 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 25.6 77% 27 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)