Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	49.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100311
Uptime	4.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '18 at 19:19
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-920-$90 69,074 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	67% Good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 133 61% 97 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 332 36% 284 Pts	64-Core 326 20% 326 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% MSI(1462 2842) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 398.11 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 25% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 261GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 210 201 207 211 212 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.3% Average	Read 227 Write 221 Mixed 202 SusWrite 208 48% 215 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 33 4K Mixed 24.8 80% 26 MB/s	DQ Read 34.9 DQ Write 74.3 DQ Mixed 47.1 38% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 134%
OCZ Agility 3 240GB-$199 10,165 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 66GB free Firmware: 2.15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 136 132 132 132 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 142 Write 178 Mixed 146 SusWrite 137 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 19.5 4K Write 37.2 4K Mixed 22.5 78% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 27.1 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 34.6 31% 46.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 66%
Seagate FA GoFlex Desk 3TB 405 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1TB free, PID 50a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 11 11 10 10 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.5% Very poor	Read 32.7 Write 28.5 Mixed 24 SusWrite 10.9 31% 24 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.5% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x2GB 45,030 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 3 of 6 slots used 6GB DIMM Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	42.2% Average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 16.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 10.9 27% 9.47 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 42.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-EX58-EXTREME Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EX58-EXTREME

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	72x
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	16x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	9x

SSD
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	11x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	10x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	43x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	29x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 42% - Average

Total price: $369

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16