Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '18 at 15:36
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	71.2% Very good	Memory 70.7 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 197 68% 122 Pts	4-Core 384 8-Core 707 65% 546 Pts	64-Core 1,055 65% 1,055 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 398.36 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 47.3 Reflection 54.7 Parallax 44.4 38% 48.8 fps	Gravity 42.8 Splatting 55.5 44% 49.2 fps
Poor: 109% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 709 584 552 516 455 493 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	168% Outstanding	Read 1,177 Write 1,116 Mixed 526 SusWrite 551 188% 843 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 85.5 4K Mixed 53.3 177% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 748 DQ Write 686 DQ Mixed 715 537% 716 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 168% Great: 306%
WD WD10JUCT-63J6SY0 1TB 3,317 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 50GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 76 77 78 78 78 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	50% Above average	Read 96.7 Write 96 Mixed 46 SusWrite 77.3 58% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 62%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 35.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 33 26% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 52%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23 63,281 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 0GB free Firmware: 01.00A02 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 83 Write 83 Mixed 60 56% 75.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C17 2x8GB 9,834 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.2% Very good	MC Read 29.7 MC Write 25.8 MC Mixed 26.2 78% 27.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 25.6 SC Mixed 19.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 117%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16