Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4.01GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4.01GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Panasonic CF-31JAGAX1M (all builds)
Motherboard	Panasonic CF31-2
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4.00781 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110801
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '18 at 23:19
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	31%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34 45,308 User benchmarks, average bench 48% IC4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Memory 83.5 1-Core 83.6 2-Core 119 60% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 174 24% 175 Pts	64-Core 171 11% 171 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(10F7 8338) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2291 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 3.5 Parallax 1.59 2% 2.48 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.27 Splatting 4.22 2% 2.65 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 188GB free (System drive) Firmware: X611 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 199 201 208 205 207 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 427 Write 207 Mixed 228 SusWrite 208 59% 268 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 32.3 4K Mixed 24.5 68% 23.2 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 11.4 80% 186 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 44GB 6,316 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 40960 MB Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	29.2% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 9.3 MC Mixed 8.7 26% 9.23 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 8.8 26% 9.2 GB/s	Latency 74.3 54% 74.3 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 29.2% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16