DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	8.63% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000 (all builds)
Motherboard	DELL 0X501H
Memory	15.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100204
Uptime	2.5 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '16 at 04:35
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 81.8 2-Core 164 69% 113 Pts	4-Core 325 8-Core 514 52% 419 Pts	64-Core 625 39% 625 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 25,436 User benchmarks, average bench 7% EVGA(3842 1450) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6451 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	8.63% Terrible	Lighting 10 Reflection 11.8 Parallax 8.41 8% 10.1 fps	MRender 13.3 Gravity 10.7 Splatting 11.2 10% 11.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.63% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 136GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 7650 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1633 (B1) Unknown 91 91 102 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 50 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 99 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36723565495	51.8% Above average	Read 263 Write 180 Mixed 182 46% 208 MB/s	4K Read 31.8 4K Write 39.5 4K Mixed 17.1 91% 29.5 MB/s	DQ Read 35.6 DQ Write 120 DQ Mixed 16.8 30% 57.4 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 609GB free Firmware: 1AA01117 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 92 1 (03) Spinup time 73 73 9030 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9085 (05) Reallocated sector count 98 98 89 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 11799 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25618 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4743 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 92 1 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 1742 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 1 470679580 (C2) HDA temperature 71 58 487456797 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 43456 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	65.3% Good	Read 115 Write 112 Mixed 111 85% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.82 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.47 132% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 65.3% Great: 62%
WD My Book 3TB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1.5TB free, PID null Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	17.5% Very poor	Read 37.1 Write 35.9 Mixed 35 46% 36 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.37 4K Mixed 0.2 55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.5% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6x4GB 28,320 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 6 of 6 slots used 24GB DIMM Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.3% Average	MC Read 14.9 MC Write 14.3 MC Mixed 10.9 38% 13.4 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 11.9 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Studio XPS 435T/9000 Builds (Compare 455 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: DELL Studio XPS 435T/9000

CPU
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	313x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	19x
Xeon X5550IntelBench 67%, 1,065 samples	15x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 260Nvidia $250Bench 7%, 11,945 samples	20x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	16x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	17x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
MKNSSDS2120GB 120GBMushkinBench 65%, 202 samples	15x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	71x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	42x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $177

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16