Samsung 900X3C/900X4C/900X4D

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 34% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

CPU throttled at 50% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Samsung 900X3C/900X4C/900X4D (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG SAMSUNG_NP1234567890
Memory	4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120426
Uptime	20 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '18 at 18:16
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%
CPU Throttled	50%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3317U-$225 26,848 User benchmarks, average bench 47% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.7 GHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	33.9% Below average	Memory 58.8 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 41.1 29% 40.7 Pts	4-Core 55 8-Core 55.3 7% 55.2 Pts	64-Core 56.2 4% 56.2 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 33.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.54% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.15 Parallax 2.69 3% 3.91 fps	MRender 5.05 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 7.43 4% 4.88 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.54% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk U100 128GB 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 68 19 8.3 18 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 360 Write 254 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 66.3 40% 181 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 7.2 28% 8.57 MB/s	DQ Read 34.1 DQ Write 9.7 DQ Mixed 11.6 11% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 55%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 129GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 66GB free, PID 0727 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 14 11 12 16 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 7.5 Mixed 12 SusWrite 14.9 17% 13 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.1 64% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB 11,714 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 9.8 25% 8.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 5.8 15% 5.3 GB/s	Latency 131 30% 131 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 900X3C/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 900X3C/900X4C/900X4D

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	14x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	16x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	6x
PM851 mSATA 128GBSamsungBench 56%, 1,419 samples	4x
MZMPC256HBGJ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 57%, 517 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5174BM0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 42%, 119 samples	12x
M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 50%, 11,714 samples	3x
AM1U16BC4P2-B19C 2x4GBAdataBench 52%, 1,385 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16