MSI MS-16J9

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Micro-Star GL62M 7REX
Motherboard	MSI MS-16J9 (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170711
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 26 '18 at 10:27
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%
CPU Throttled	49%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 99.9 47% 73.9 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 228 24% 190 Pts	64-Core 227 14% 227 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile) 105,856 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 11C8) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 24.21.13.9836 Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 29.3 Parallax 32.9 27% 31.8 fps	MRender 38 Gravity 32.8 Splatting 33.6 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsn5128gpu7 TOSHIBA 128GB 3,510 User benchmarks, average bench 139% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 57XA4104 SusWrite @10s intervals: 505 476 546 576 549 523 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	124% Outstanding	Read 933 Write 514 Mixed 564 SusWrite 529 142% 635 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 53.2 4K Mixed 37.7 119% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 447 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 334 262% 365 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 176%
Hitachi HTS541010B7E610 1TB 40,802 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 908GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 109 106 110 108 107 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Read 112 Write 106 Mixed 75.8 SusWrite 108 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 7.5 4K Mixed 0.7 262% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GB 122,420 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	38.8% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 11 38% 13.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 14.6 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 96.1 42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MS-16J9 Builds (Compare 3,727 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J9

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	2,440x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	1,287x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	2,222x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,007x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	497x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	205x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	126x
THNSNJ128G8NY 128GBToshibaBench 73%, 7,789 samples	109x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	757x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	301x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	211x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16