ECS H81H3-M4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	2.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	ECS H81H3-M4 (all builds)
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150521
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 24 '18 at 20:20
Run Duration	261 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium G3240-$51 10,752 User benchmarks, average bench 50% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 75.8 1-Core 87.8 2-Core 175 65% 113 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 150 22% 161 Pts	64-Core 165 10% 165 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Elitegroup(1019 7E44) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.05% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 3.62 Parallax 3.22 2% 2.98 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 3.91 3% 3.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.05% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 246GB free Firmware: 21.00M22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 58 58 57 57 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 57.3 Write 59.3 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 57.7 40% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 173% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 36%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013) 72,354 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 406GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 64 49 71 60 75 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46.9% Average	Read 96.7 Write 93 Mixed 52.8 SusWrite 66.4 57% 77.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 63%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 634GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 41 41 41 41 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 38.8 Write 40.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 40.5 49% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 20%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 500GB 3,970 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 465GB free, PID 5021 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 36 38 38 38 36 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 38.5 Write 38.2 Mixed 26 SusWrite 37.3 47% 35 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 52% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 31%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 16GB-$8 3,010 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID 1642 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 5.3 5.3 5.2 5.3 5.3 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	4.67% Terrible	Read 15.3 Write 9.3 Mixed 6 SusWrite 5.3 11% 8.98 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 22% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.67% Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 9,902 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 3.6 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	4.95% Terrible	Read 21 Write 17 Mixed 9.5 SusWrite 4.3 16% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 19% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.95% Great: 6%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 16GB 879 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID cb10 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.5 3.9 3.6 4 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Read 15.5 Write 8.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 4.1 11% 9.15 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.7 44% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 11%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 1,913 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 7GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Read 1 Write 1 Mixed 1 SusWrite 0.5 1% 0.88 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 7%
USB Flash Disk 4GB 2,580 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	0.44% Terrible	Read 1 Write 0.5 Mixed 1 SusWrite 0.5 1% 0.75 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 0.44% Great: 9%
Apple iPod 80GB 76 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 1209 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 10 11 11 10 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Read 14.5 Write 13.5 Mixed 12.7 SusWrite 10.3 17% 12.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 22% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 0420 8GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.5% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13 39% 13.8 GB/s	SC Read 9.3 SC Write 12 SC Mixed 11.1 31% 10.8 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81H3-M4 Builds (Compare 986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-M4

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	97x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	93x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	74x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	177x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	135x
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	120x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
SSD 120GBLonglineBench 65%, 271 samples	25x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	24x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	25x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	20x
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $178

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16