| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | EVGA Default string |
| Motherboard | EVGA 134-KS-E377 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit färger |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180320 |
| Uptime | 1.6 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 22 '18 at 11:56 |
| Run Duration | 192 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 12% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.6%
Excellent
|
94% 174 Pts
|
82% 678 Pts
|
75% 1,207 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia Titan Xp
Nvidia(10DE 11DF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2852 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42%
Average
|
39% 48.8 fps
|
48% 58.8 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.4%
Very good
|
70% 24.7 GB/s
|
65% 22.7 GB/s
|
54% 74.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 134-KS-E377 Builds (Compare 368 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: EVGA 134-KS-E377
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 194x |
| Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 57x |
| Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 29x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 46x |
| RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $757 |