Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemToshiba Qosmio X75-A  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140418
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateJul 21 '18 at 20:52
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
68% Good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 170
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 320
8-Core 483
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 298
18% 298 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA77) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.71% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 6.19
3% 9.41 fps
MRender 8.24
Gravity 2.33
Splatting 7.39
5% 5.99 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.71%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HTTAN101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 156 174 231 377 335 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 376
Write 102
Mixed 212
SusWrite 234
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 26.5
84% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 239
176% 239 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58
373GB free
Firmware: AX1P1A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 102 103 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57% Above average
Read 97.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 101
60% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
WD My Passport 2TB
318GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 61 60 61 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 57
SusWrite 60.3
107% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.4% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.3
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.5
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $376
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback