Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 85.6 1-Core 59.9 2-Core 118 56% 87.9 Pts	4-Core 215 8-Core 350 35% 283 Pts	64-Core 353 22% 353 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 317 138 131 139 141 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Read 442 Write 412 Mixed 288 SusWrite 168 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 74.4 4K Mixed 42.5 143% 49.9 MB/s	DQ Read 258 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 146 138% 215 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 108%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 64GB-$7 7,617 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 29GB free, PID 5591 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 19 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 28.2 Write 16.5 Mixed 19.4 SusWrite 17.9 26% 20.5 MB/s	4K Read 4.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.3 116% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB 16,567 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8.9 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 10.3 27% 9.57 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	37x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	18x

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $610

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16