Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	53.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 21 '18 at 12:09
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Memory 95.7 1-Core 160 2-Core 321 105% 192 Pts	4-Core 642 8-Core 1,032 103% 837 Pts	64-Core 1,328 82% 1,328 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 70.6 Parallax 62.7 54% 66.7 fps	MRender 73.5 Gravity 62.9 Splatting 56.4 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston KC1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB-$320 1,236 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 295GB free (System drive) Firmware: E7FT04.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 741 803 737 693 638 594 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	155% Outstanding	Read 885 Write 941 Mixed 491 SusWrite 701 170% 754 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 115 4K Mixed 40.8 160% 62.1 MB/s	DQ Read 479 DQ Write 783 DQ Mixed 536 433% 599 MB/s
Poor: 107% ↑ This bench: 155% Great: 209%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 213GB free Firmware: EXT0BB0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 262 261 262 261 261 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 463 Write 452 Mixed 416 SusWrite 278 90% 402 MB/s	4K Read 45.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 60.1 210% 75.6 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 345 DQ Mixed 235 211% 320 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 118%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 133 135 135 135 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73% Very good	Read 120 Write 128 Mixed 89 SusWrite 134 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 101%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 4x4GB-$115 5,380 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2747 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	92.1% Outstanding	MC Read 34.8 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 27.6 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 37.8 SC Mixed 27.7 83% 29 GB/s	Latency 55 73% 55 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.1% Great: 111%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	115x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	145x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	90x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	83x

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $844

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16