Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 21 '18 at 10:27
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 83.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 792
72% 605 Pts
64-Core 1122
69% 1122 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199
MSI(1462 3030) 2GB
CLim: 1080 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 38.8
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 47
32% 40.2 fps
MRender 30.9
Gravity 32.2
Splatting 40.4
29% 34.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 29%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1229 305 294 291 292 293 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 2,009
Write 1,430
Mixed 685
SusWrite 450
253% 1,143 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 49
182% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 671
DQ Mixed 584
493% 724 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 199%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
340GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 54 45 69 76 82 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 82.2
Write 68.8
Mixed 55
SusWrite 65.3
50% 67.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 96%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
568GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 86 87 88 88 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 103
Write 97.5
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 87.3
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 41.1
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 32.3
104% 36.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 26.8
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 74.9
53% 74.9 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback