Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	5.59% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel U4100 1,054 User benchmarks, average bench 29% CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	13.3% Very poor	Memory 22.4 1-Core 11.8 2-Core 17.2 12% 17.1 Pts	4-Core 25.8 8-Core 20.9 3% 23.3 Pts	64-Core 9.4 1% 9.4 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family 23,924 User benchmarks, average bench 0% Acer(1025 0229) Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.25% Terrible	Lighting 0.33 Reflection 0.27 Parallax 0.16 0% 0.25 fps	MRender 0.24 Gravity 0.33 Splatting 0.22 0% 0.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.25% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 9GB free (System drive) Firmware: 120504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 15 1.9 6.1 6.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	5.59% Terrible	Read 81.4 Write 43.2 Mixed 20 SusWrite 11.4 8% 39 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0 6% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 5.59% Great: 30%
Generic- Multi-Card 32GB 230 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 13GB free, PID 0159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 11 11 11 11 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.78% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 11.7 Mixed 10.7 SusWrite 11.3 16% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.3 23% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.78% Great: 14%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5673EH1-CF8 80CE M471B5273CH0-CH9 6GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.04% Terrible	MC Read 1.2 MC Write 1.7 MC Mixed 1.8 4% 1.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.3 SC Write 2.1 SC Mixed 0.9 3% 1.1 GB/s	Latency 304 13% 304 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 5.04% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
U4100IntelBench 29%, 1,054 samples	1x

GPU
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 2,358 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16