| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 5.53% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20070719 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '18 at 20:07 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
37.1%
Below average
|
31% 44.6 Pts
|
11% 84.6 Pts
|
6% 98.6 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.0
|
5.53%
Terrible
|
6% 6.93 fps
|
5% 6.08 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
24GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 78 84 108 97 94 MB/s
|
44.5%
Average
|
55% 75.5 MB/s
|
144% 1.13 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 82 46 55 41 80 MB/s
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
18% 24 MB/s
|
21% 0.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
14.6%
Very poor
|
13% 4.67 GB/s
|
10% 3.6 GB/s
|
32% 127 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P5K SE Builds (Compare 210 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P5K SE
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 37x |
| Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 17x |
| Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
| GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $100 |