Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130115
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 17:29
Run Duration362 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.6% Average
Memory 68.9
1-Core 49.1
2-Core 92.8
45% 70.3 Pts
4-Core 147
8-Core 197
22% 172 Pts
64-Core 217
14% 217 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Nvidia(10DE 098F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.43
Relative performance (0th percentile)
0.37% Terrible
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 4.96
Parallax 3.31
0% 2.77 fps
MRender 4.43
Gravity 0.03
Splatting 0.09
1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 0.37%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.1.0
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 4.8
Mixed 2.5
1% 3.65 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Mixed 0
3% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 0.1 2.7 21 7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.4% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 22.3
Mixed 12
SusWrite 7.8
13% 17.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.1
19% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 107%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
290GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 66 66 66 65 67 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.4% Average
Read 78
Write 77.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 65.9
53% 71.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 59%
SAMSUNG HM750LI 750GB
38GB free, PID 022e
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 45 45 45 45 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 44.8
Write 14.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 42.5
38% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
38% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
800, 800 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
30.8% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 12.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $251
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback