| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H55M-USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20101101 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 20 '18 at 16:43 |
| Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
| Run User | EGY-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.7%
Good
|
61% 99.1 Pts
|
34% 252 Pts
|
17% 271 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD R9 270-$140
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.200.0.0
|
17%
Very poor
|
26% 34.9 fps
| ||
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
464GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
|
2.55%
Terrible
|
4% 19.5 MB/s
|
2% 0.57 MB/s
| |
|
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$40
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 500.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 34 37 40 42 43 MB/s
|
39.1%
Below average
|
46% 62.6 MB/s
|
131% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
|
30.4%
Below average
|
40% 54.3 MB/s
|
122% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 12GB
null MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
39.2%
Below average
|
38% 13.5 GB/s
|
27% 9.4 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H55M-USB3 Builds (Compare 266 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 54x |
| Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 32x |
| Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 13x |
| GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $128 |