Foxconn Flaming Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Foxconn Flaming Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Foxconn Flaming Blade
Memory	10.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20101012
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 20 '18 at 13:20
Run Duration	114 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5660 6,950 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 4.15 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.2% Outstanding	Memory 97.6 1-Core 115 2-Core 229 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 685 71% 571 Pts	64-Core 679 42% 679 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 560-$500 60,738 User benchmarks, average bench 22% Gigabyte(1458 22FB) 2GB CLim: 1425 MHz, MLim: 1825 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.6.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 35.7 Parallax 46.5 31% 40.1 fps	MRender 34.8 Gravity 35.9 Splatting 0.09 17% 23.6 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 25%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 52 39 28 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	27.3% Poor	Read 59.8 Write 63.8 Mixed 47.8 SusWrite 34.9 38% 51.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 27.3% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3x4GB 39,448 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 3 of 6 slots used 12GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	61.7% Good	MC Read 23 MC Write 18.6 MC Mixed 24.1 63% 21.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 10 SC Mixed 14.3 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 47.6 84% 47.6 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Flaming Blade Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 28%

Raft

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

System: Foxconn Flaming Blade

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	4x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	3x
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	2x
GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples	2x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	7x
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	3x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 37% - Below average

Total price: $226

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16