Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair V Formula  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121017
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJul 20 '18 at 11:03
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8150-$770
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
63.4% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 132
58% 94.4 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 383
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.6.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 50.2
Parallax 54
37% 50 fps
MRender 49.8
Gravity 40
Splatting 36.3
34% 42 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,120
Write 2,705
Mixed 2,700
633% 2,842 MB/s
4K Read 177
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 109
461% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 152
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 160
132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 110%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
31GB free
Firmware: 2.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 95 94 92 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 159
Write 128
Mixed 131
SusWrite 91.5
28% 127 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 32
120% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 76.8
70% 108 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
53GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 95 100 101 100 96 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 170
Write 115
Mixed 132
SusWrite 95.8
29% 128 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 28.8
114% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 79.7
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 94
72% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
8GB free
Firmware: CC44
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 183
Write 151
Mixed 78.8
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 113%
Hitachi HDT725050VLA380 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: V56O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 57 57 56 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 65.7
Write 56
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 56.5
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
47.1% Average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 16.8
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 12.7
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $680
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback