Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 22:25
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$241
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 270
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 680
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 751
46% 751 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.3
88% 105 fps
MRender 97.8
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 99.4
81% 99 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1124 456 306 308 305 307 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
231% Outstanding
Read 1,842
Write 1262
Mixed 581
SusWrite 468
229% 1,038 MB/s
4K Read 49.9
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 65.9
240% 89 MB/s
DQ Read 1,331
DQ Write 1,129
DQ Mixed 875
752% 1,112 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 231%
Great: 236%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
149GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 329 332 331 330 333 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 431
Write 330
Mixed 313
SusWrite 329
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 43.5
162% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 182
156% 224 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 97%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 178 169 178 184 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 179
Mixed 34.2
SusWrite 179
101% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
150% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50
91GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 111 100 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 31
SusWrite 109
62% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2
368% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49
482GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 124 123 125 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 140
Write 126
Mixed 118
SusWrite 124
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.7% Average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 14.7
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.1
40% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $992
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback