Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive35.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus F1A55-M LK R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 19 '18 at 14:31
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-3500 APU-$60
FM1 , 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
41.7% Average
Memory 66.6
1-Core 34.1
2-Core 68.1
38% 56.3 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 102
14% 101 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Gigabyte(1458 3748) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2062 MHz, MLim: 2551 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.5% Very good
Lighting 67.3
Reflection 83.5
Parallax 141
55% 97.3 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 150
Splatting 121
107% 131 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 75 13 90 72 71 MB/s
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.7% Below average
Read 223
Write 152
Mixed 185
SusWrite 75
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 25.7
4K Mixed 16.6
61% 19.9 MB/s
DQ Read 88.7
DQ Write 64
DQ Mixed 40.2
40% 64.3 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
121GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 72 75 82 82 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 90.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 80.3
57% 77.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Cruzer Force 32GB
25GB free, PID 557d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.9 8 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Read 31.9
Write 6.8
Mixed 9.3
SusWrite 7.5
15% 13.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.3
136% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.5
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A55-M LK R2.0 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A55-M LK R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 28% - Poor Total price: $369
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback