| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 51.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20141202 |
| Uptime | 4.7 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 19 '18 at 11:47 |
| Run Duration | 146 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 16% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.2%
Good
|
62% 101 Pts
|
40% 328 Pts
|
27% 433 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.3%
Above average
|
52% 65 fps
|
50% 61.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 170 189 193 197 191 MB/s
|
55.2%
Above average
|
40% 178 MB/s
|
107% 36.6 MB/s
|
33% 46.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
1TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 124 125 126 125 125 MB/s
|
57.7%
Above average
|
109% 82 MB/s
|
197% 2.2 MB/s
| |
|
Generic- SD/MMC 134GB
9GB free, PID 0151
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.9 9.4 9.5 10 10 10 MB/s
|
4.74%
Terrible
|
12% 9.35 MB/s
|
14% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
49.5%
Average
|
50% 17.6 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
58% 68.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,854 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 505x |
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 324x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 185x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples | 139x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 127x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 90x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $138 |