Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20140129
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '18 at 08:47
Run Duration	181 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 98.3 1-Core 124 2-Core 241 88% 154 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 644 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410 30,815 User benchmarks, average bench 53% EVGA(3842 2883) 3GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.3% Above average	Lighting 66.9 Reflection 67.2 Parallax 85.6 54% 73.2 fps	MRender 79.9 Gravity 73.5 Splatting 50.7 54% 68 fps
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 54.3% Great: 59%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 128GB-$70 18,195 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 37GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 186 151 132 137 181 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	84.8% Excellent	Read 377 Write 368 Mixed 264 SusWrite 163 66% 293 MB/s	4K Read 35.8 4K Write 92.6 4K Mixed 43.7 159% 57.4 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 219 170% 233 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 84.8% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 65GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 196 201 232 231 194 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	96.2% Outstanding	Read 378 Write 358 Mixed 335 SusWrite 208 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 41.6 4K Write 93.5 4K Mixed 55.9 184% 63.7 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 235 178% 239 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 96.2% Great: 134%
Mushkin Chronos 240GB-$99 690 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 63GB free Firmware: 560ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 102 101 97 98 89 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	56.5% Above average	Read 169 Write 128 Mixed 134 SusWrite 99.3 30% 133 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 83.8 4K Mixed 32.8 122% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 130 DQ Mixed 108 89% 127 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 91%
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 107GB free Firmware: DXT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 249 248 250 250 249 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.9% Excellent	Read 486 Write 257 Mixed 176 SusWrite 249 65% 292 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 25.9 144% 58.5 MB/s	DQ Read 371 DQ Write 213 DQ Mixed 57.8 106% 214 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 214GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 127 124 124 126 126 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	78.5% Very good	Read 148 Write 156 Mixed 88 SusWrite 126 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 78.5% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2666 C11 2x8GB 265 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	MC Read 28 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 21.4 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.1 SC Write 22.3 SC Mixed 20.6 59% 20.7 GB/s	Latency 44.8 89% 44.8 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI FORMULA Builds (Compare 835 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 61%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 51%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI FORMULA - $400

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	495x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	159x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	65x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	54x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	35x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	35x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	26x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	32x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	28x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 90% - Excellent

Total price: $761

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16