| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 20.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Gigabyte G31M-ES2C |
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 1200 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 8.1 |
| BIOS Date | 20090929 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 19 '18 at 05:17 |
| Run Duration | 150 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 42% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5440
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
46.9%
Average
|
41% 62.2 Pts
|
20% 148 Pts
|
9% 149 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 388.13
|
20.7%
Poor
|
20% 26.4 fps
|
23% 28.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate ST3320820AS 320GB-$55
259GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.AHG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 22 23 23 MB/s
|
8.26%
Terrible
|
8% 11.3 MB/s
|
17% 0.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
202GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 27 27 30 29 30 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
23% 30.3 MB/s
|
100% 0.63 MB/s
| |
|
Lexar JumpDrive P10 USB 3.0 32GB-$71
26GB free, PID a836
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 23 22 25 23 23 MB/s
|
15%
Very poor
|
34% 25 MB/s
|
149% 3.6 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM
|
18.5%
Very poor
|
16% 5.73 GB/s
|
16% 5.67 GB/s
|
39% 103 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-G31M-S2C Builds (Compare 133 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2C
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples | 15x |
| Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples | 11x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 10x |
| GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples | 7x |
| GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples | 6x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 45% - Average | Total price: $117 |